Capital Chatter square logo

This has been a week of bad news, worse news and occasional good news in Oregon government. But instead of recounting all those downs, ups and sideways, let’s check in on a continuing issue: unemployment.

Oregon’s unemployment compensation system mirrors the nation’s — a disgrace. Many jobless Oregonians have been waiting for months for promised payments. The fact that other states are equally messed up is no consolation and should be no excuse for Oregon.

On the other hand, Oregon households and local economies would be in far worse shape without the more than $3.6 billion that has been paid in unemployment claims since March 15, the week that Gov. Kate Brown first issued stay-home orders and restricted business operations.

The Oregon Employment Department now has more than 1,000 workers processing unemployment claims, compared with 100 in mid-March when the avalanche of pandemic-related unemployment claims began. The department has made substantial progress under Acting Director David Gerstenfeld, individual employees have made herculean efforts — according to my sources — and the agency gradually has found faster ways to process claims.

Gerstenfeld deserves credit for being accessible, holding weekly press briefings via teleconference.

Yet the department’s prime metric for measuring improvement —  number of claims processed — is irrelevant to everyday Oregonians. Gerstenfeld this week announced that the agency was ahead of its self-imposed schedule and had completed processing 70,000 initial claims for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance.

Here's the rub: Initial processing is a major step but only the first one. It doesn’t mean checks are on their way to jobless Oregonians.

The better metrics would be the number of unresolved claims —  which apparently remain in the tens of thousands — and how long people have been waiting for payments.

The department creates extra work for itself because frustrated Oregonians must try multiple ways to get answers to their questions: calling; emailing, although that system has been shut down after being swamped with more than 280,000 emails; sending old-fashioned mail; using the new online “Contact Us” form; and contacting their legislators for assistance. Many phone lines have been added, but they’re still jammed. The average 37-minute wait time on the phone is a joke because many callers only get busy signals.

My suggestion is to contact your legislator for help, as House Speaker Tina Kotek and other lawmakers have suggested, although this week Gerstenfeld seemed to downplay that. He is asking Oregonians to primarily use the online contact form.

Meanwhile, the agency continues sending confusing letters to claimants. A Salem resident reported receiving 18 letters in one week — but still no payments.

I asked Gerstenfeld about the form letters, which might be applicable to some traditional unemployment situations but rarely to the new Pandemic Unemployment Assistance for gig workers and others. He said the computer system automatically sends the letters when it notices something that would prevent a benefit payment.

“Rather than having our experts change the programming that would be needed to stop or to change those notices, they’ve been working constantly on implementing these new benefit programs; and then they’ll be shifting to any new federal programs that’s created in the waiting week,” Gerstenfeld said. “I’ll apologize for that. I know that that causes confusion and it’s not ideal.”

I wonder how much money is being wasted on envelopes, paper and postage. Even more, I wonder why there isn’t a prolific public relations campaign: “Please ignore all letters you receive from the Oregon Employment Department unless … .” In the meantime, those confusing notices add to the stress of unemployed Oregonians.

The department has taken some common-sense steps and discerned how to get money to some people faster. Why did it take so long? What more can be done? It seems the department lacks a culture of outside-the-box thinking and a management attitude of, “Do whatever it takes. Just fix it. Now.”

The department feels encumbered both by past practices and by the federal unemployment regulations. Except in extreme times like these, that’s the approach the public wants.

Government agencies generally are risk-averse. Professional reputations and taxpayer dollars are at stake. The public and political ramifications of failure are severe. Front-page headlines await those who royally mess up. Yet great managers welcome outside-the-box thinking instead of fearing the results. Such managers balance a certain level of risk with the potential outcomes, instead of comfortably staying in the status quo.

It's the job of CEOs — the governor for state agencies, county commissioners for county departments, etc. — to recruit, hire and retain such executives. Too often it’s easier to hire someone who checks the right boxes, fits the party line and (to mix my metaphors) won’t rock the government boat. Could this be why questionable leadership has plagued the Oregon Employment Department for years?

Amid the unresolved backlog of unemployment claims this spring, Gov. Brown finally ousted director Kay Erickson, whom Brown had appointed in 2016. Brown was pushed into action by Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, Congressman Peter DeFazio, state legislators and others.

As for the future, all this raises the question of whether the department should proceed with its computer modernization or take a reset with far greater public involvement.

New technology desperately is needed. That’s obvious. But past IT improvements were bungled. With the residue of the Cover Oregon fiasco hanging over the state, the department let millions of federal moderation dollars sit unspent.

A new technology system must be flexible in the ways that the agency’s 1993-era mainframe system is not. America’s and Oregon’s unemployment systems were built for an old-style economy and were based on social norms of nearly 90 years ago. Wyden is among those pushing Congress to modernize the rules, including making permanent the availability of jobless benefits for out-of-work gig workers. Oregon’s technology must be nimbly responsive to such changes, and to treating claimants with humanity.

Even in good times, the feds and Oregon considered it acceptable for claimants to wait three weeks to receive benefits. That is heartless. Yet today some people have been waiting three months.

Although the unemployment mess is a critical issue for Oregonians, legislators apparently don’t have a handle on how to rectify it. Lawmakers already are divided on what to take up in the special session that Brown has called for Monday. Tempers were flaring during this week’s committee hearings.

It’s also been a month since Kotek, D-Portland, and Senate President Peter Courtney, D-Salem, said they wanted the state to immediately issue “emergency relief checks of $500 per person for Oregonians who have applied for unemployment benefits and have not yet received their benefits from the Oregon Employment Department.”

The checks are not in the mail.

Really.

A new spokesperson: Melanni Rosales began work this week as the Employment Department’s communications director. Rosales previously worked for progressive organizations in Portland, including Family Forward Oregon and Our Oregon, as a communications consultant, and as digital director for a Democratic gubernatorial candidate in Maryland.

Dick Hughes, who writes the weekly Capital Chatter column, has been covering the Oregon political scene since 1976. Contact him at TheHughesisms@Gmail.com , Facebook.com/Hughesisms, YouTube.com/DickHughes or Twitter.com/DickHughes.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.